Foundation Re-founding Post-War 1970 to Present Commentary |
Observations | Concept | Precincts | Guidelines | Implementation |
Plan
Hornbostel's Design |
Hornbostel proceeded with a design for a campus that responded to the
unique characteristics of the landscape. Accounts indicate that Hornbostel was
particularly impressed with the "rolling hills, pines, and even marble as native
stone." (English, p. 20) For Hornbostel, the Druid Hills landscape evoked qualities
similar to the rolling landscape of Northern Italy. The Italian Renaissance villa became a
suitable precedent for Hornbostel's Emory campus designs. The parterres and terrace
gardens of Italian villas would serve as precedents for the quadrangle spaces, villa
buildings and their dependencies would become the paradigm for the library and classroom
buildings, and the unique "nestling" of architecture, gardens, and the broader
landscape found in Italian villas led the way for the siting of the composition on the
Druid Hills parcel. In a sense, since the site had at the time of the Civil War been the
location of the Paden Plantation, the transformation to a college campus by way of a villa
paradigm lends a poetic dimension to the designs. The Hornbostel plan provides a
"high-art" rendition of the plantation/villa paradigm that is particularly
responsive to the site's history.
Villa Tressino, Palladio For Hornbostel, the ravines that skirted the building sites were not obstacles to be
overcome, rather they provided unique features of the site that would embellish the
design. Thus a depression in the landscape, a small creek, a stand of trees were not seen
as obstructions to the approach of the main quadrangle, something to be begrudgingly
bridged, infilled, or felled, so that cars and pedestrians could move efficiently from one
place to another. Hornbostel saw these features of the landscape as amenities of the
ultimate design. Prominent in Hornbostel's "Birds Eye View" of the Emory campus
are the two ravines that separate the academic grouping from the other areas of the
campus. These areas were intended to at once weave aspects of the natural landscape with
those of the man-made interventions and at the same time act as "thresholds" and
boundaries between the various areas of the campus. |
Landscape and Architecture |
The design of the exterior spaces of the campus and the individual
buildings were seen by Hornbostel as interdependent problems to be addressed in the
design. Perhaps it is for this reason that the original core of campus buildings remain to
this day the most memorable portions of Emory. The experience of both exterior landscape
and interior built environment comprise a seamless visual experience in this area of the
campus. In the "Birds Eye View," one can note that campus is divided into
various districts: an academic quadrangle, a residential quadrangle, an athletic field,
and a quadrangle formed by the Physiology and Anatomy Buildings. Each of these districts
were carefully positioned with regard to the natural lay of the land and were segregated
from one another by landscape features. Hornbostel situated the entire academic quadrangle
composition to enhance to a picturesque approach sequence. The visitor would leave
"suburban" Atlanta by crossing the intersection of North Decatur and South
Oxford Roads advancing onto the campus proper. Then, by moving along a winding road that
penetrated a densely wooded area and bridged a deep ravine, the promenade would extend to
the formal cross-axis of the academic quadrangle. An heroically scaled library building
flanked by numerous "good-soldier" college buildings would have commanded the
approach to the composition. The major axis of the quadrangle was oriented by Hornbostel
in a north-east/south-westerly direction so that the open terrace situated to the south of
the library building would conceivably have provided views in the direction of downtown
Atlanta's skyline. This space flanked by the Theology and Law buildings would have
featured a large oval fountain and a monumental colonnade. Clearly Hornbostel had intended
this space as a frontispiece to the campus proper, a threshold, through which the visitor
would pass upon entry to the main quadrangle located directly to the north of the library.
Bird's Eye View of Emory The library building, had it been completed according to the architect's plans, would have been based upon a reconstruction of the Tomb of Mausolus, at Hallicarnassus. Reconstructions of the Mausolus Tomb became popularized after the 1905 publication of Hector d'Espouy's, Fragments d'Architecture antique d'après les relevés et restaurations des ancients pensionnaires de l'Académie de France à Rome. Louis Bernier's reconstruction of the tomb, depicted in d'Espouy's publication and circulated in other publications prior to 1905, influenced the design of Grant's Tomb, by architect John Duncan, in New York City (1897), the Temple of Scottish Rite Freemasonry (1914), by John Russell Pope, in Washington, D.C., and ultimately Hornbostel's own design for the Soldiers' and Sailors' Memorial Hall (1907-11), in Pittsburgh. Flanking Hornbostel's library building were a series of three-story buildings that would hold the activities of the various colleges. Four of these buildings were built according to the Hornbostel plan.
Emory Library as proposed by Hornbostel |
Problems and Solutions |
Hornbostel's architectural contributions to the Emory campus set the tone
for much of the future development of the campus. Of necessity, construction on the campus
buildings were begun even before the plans for the proposed buildings had been finalized.
Though this meant that work would proceed with all rapidity, it did produce the
unfortunate consequence of driving up the costs of construction. This fact was noted by
Bishop Warren Candler, the university's Chancellor, and became a point of contention
between his eminence, the architect, and the contractor. Candler wrote in letters to
Hornbostel, and to the contractor Arthur Tufts, that he, ". . . regard(ed) strong men
as more important to an institution than costly buildings." (Bierle, p. 54) Both
Hornbostel and Tufts responded by noting that "the unprecedented conditions of the
material market brought about by the European War,. . . caused prices of material to
change overnight, and deliveries to be delayed for months." (Bierle, p. 55) They
noted that in comparison to other college buildings erected in the vicinity of Atlanta,
the Hornbostel buildings were built at a lower cost per cubic foot. Hornbostel wrote to
the Chancellor, "It is not fair to assume that, because the buildings are elegant
looking and well built, and commodious and appear as expensive structures, they run
contrary to your standard of the University." (Bierle, p. 55) While the cost of the
buildings may have bothered the University's Chancellor, the President of the Board of
Trustees and principal donor to the University, Asa Candler, appears to have favored the
Hornbostel-Tufts solution. Indeed Hornbostel had employed innovative techniques to bring
down the cost of construction while rendering the appearance of a much richer building.
For example, during a visit to the Georgia quarries from which the exterior cladding of
the buildings were to be fabricated, Hornbostel became aware of piles of scrap marble that
had been rejected for use in other architectural projects. Realizing that he could get a
better price for the material if he were to utilize this material, Hornbostel devised a
technique of squaring the scraps and finishing-off a single face of the material. The
marble was then laid-up on site with plaster of Paris serving to close the mortar joints.
Using metal clips to bond the "veneer" of marble to the structure, Hornbostel
then directed the contractor to pour concrete behind the marble exterior. In utilizing
this technique, Hornbostel was able not only to purchase the marble at a lower price, but
he was also able to build the exterior wall out of reinforced concrete without the
additional cost of expensive formwork. He was able to omit the formwork because the marble
exterior finish of the building essentially performed this role. (North, pp. 429-430)
Hornbostel utilized both grey and pink Georgian marbles for the construction of the
buildings on the Emory campus. The blocks were laid-up in a random bond which added
variety and visual interest to the façades of the buildings. The hip-roofs of the
original campus buildings were clad in clay-tiles lending a subtle yellow-ochre hue to the
composition. |
Emory Home | Campus Master Plan | Analysis of Place | to page 3 Copyright © 1997 Ayers/Saint/Gross. |